Walker v. Warden Harold D. Graham

Walker v. Warden Harold D. Graham

Petitioner:	Rashid Walker
Respondent:	Warden Harold D. Graham
Case Number:	1:2010cv05558
Filed:	November 29, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge:	Carol B. Amon
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 2, 2013	Filing 14 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR HABEAS RELIEF: For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum and Order, the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. As Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the petition and to close this case. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 7/2/2013. (Doerr, Mark)
December 17, 2010	Filing 3 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Accordingly, the Court directs petitioner to show cause by written affirmation, within 30 days from entry of this Memorandum and Order, why the petition should not be dismissed as time-barred by the AEDPA's one year statute of limitations. No response or answer shall be required at this time from respondent and all further proceedings shall be stayed for 30 days or until petitioner has complied with this Order. If petitioner fails to comply with this Order within the time allowed, the instant petition shall be dismissed as time-barred under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). SO ORDERED. (Ordered by Judge Carol B. Amon, on 12/17/2010) C/mailed w/Affirmation form. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 2, 2013

Filing 14 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR HABEAS RELIEF: For the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum and Order, the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. As Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the petition and to close this case. Ordered by Judge Pamela K. Chen on 7/2/2013. (Doerr, Mark)

December 17, 2010

Filing 3 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Accordingly, the Court directs petitioner to show cause by written affirmation, within 30 days from entry of this Memorandum and Order, why the petition should not be dismissed as time-barred by the AEDPA's one year statute of limitations. No response or answer shall be required at this time from respondent and all further proceedings shall be stayed for 30 days or until petitioner has complied with this Order. If petitioner fails to comply with this Order within the time allowed, the instant petition shall be dismissed as time-barred under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). SO ORDERED. (Ordered by Judge Carol B. Amon, on 12/17/2010) C/mailed w/Affirmation form. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Walker v. Warden Harold D. Graham
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Rashid Walker
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Harold D. Graham
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?