Waters v. Martuscello

Waters v. Martuscello

Petitioner:	Keith Waters
Respondent:	Daniel Martuscello
Case Number:	1:2010cv05700
Filed:	November 24, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge:	Dora Lizette Irizarry
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 27, 2014	Filing 32 ORDER DENYING PETITION OF WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2254 --- For the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED WRITTEN MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, the Petition made pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is dismissed in its entirety. Petitio ner is further denied a certificate of appealability, as he has failed to make a "substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); see FED. R. APP. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Lucidore v. New York State Div. of Parole, 209 F.3d 107, 112 (2d Cir. 2000). The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and, therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Electronic Order and the ATTACHED WRITTEN MEMORANDUM AND ORDER to pro se Petitioner and to close this case. SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 3/27/2014. (Irizarry, Dora)
March 12, 2012	Filing 26 ORDER granting 12 Motion to Quash - For the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED WRITTEN SUMMARY ORDER, Petitioner's motion for issuance and service of a subpoena is denied and Respondent's motion to quash the subpoena is granted in its en tirety. As petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability shall not issue. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and, therefore, in forma pauperis is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962). The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Electronic Order and the Attached Written Summary Order to pro se Petitioner.. Ordered by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 3/12/2012. (Irizarry, Dora)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 27, 2014

Filing 32 ORDER DENYING PETITION OF WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2254 --- For the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED WRITTEN MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, the Petition made pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is dismissed in its entirety. Petitio ner is further denied a certificate of appealability, as he has failed to make a "substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); see FED. R. APP. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Lucidore v. New York State Div. of Parole, 209 F.3d 107, 112 (2d Cir. 2000). The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and, therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Electronic Order and the ATTACHED WRITTEN MEMORANDUM AND ORDER to pro se Petitioner and to close this case. SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 3/27/2014. (Irizarry, Dora)

March 12, 2012

Filing 26 ORDER granting 12 Motion to Quash - For the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED WRITTEN SUMMARY ORDER, Petitioner's motion for issuance and service of a subpoena is denied and Respondent's motion to quash the subpoena is granted in its en tirety. As petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability shall not issue. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and, therefore, in forma pauperis is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962). The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Electronic Order and the Attached Written Summary Order to pro se Petitioner.. Ordered by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 3/12/2012. (Irizarry, Dora)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Waters v. Martuscello
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Daniel Martuscello
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Keith Waters
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?