Scott v. Rock
Kwame Scott |
Rock |
1:2010cv05989 |
December 23, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Brooklyn Office |
Sandra L. Townes |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 57 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re 48 Second MOTION to Amend/Correct/Supplement Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. It is ORDERED that, on or before 2/10/2017, Respondent shall provide the Court with (1) notices of entry or other evidence establishing the dates on which Justice Dowling's decisions and orders denying Petitioner's § 440 motions were served on Petitioner and/or (2) supplemental briefing relating to question of when the 30-day period for seeking leave to appeal from the denial of a § 440.10 motion commences. If Respondent files supplemental submissions within the time provided, Petitioner shall have until 3/10/2017, in which to respond to those submissions. If the Court does not receive any supplemental submissions from Respondent by the close of business on 2/10/2017, it will grant Petitioner's application to file a third amended petition. Ordered by Judge Sandra L. Townes on 1/6/2017. C/M (Barrett, C) |
Filing 30 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Petitioner's motion to amend his Petition is granted to the extent of permitting amendment to add the "newly discovered evidence" claim raised in Petitioner's § 440 motion dated 2/10/2011. Petit ioner shall not raise the Brady claim discussed in his July 14 Letter unless he first provides evidence to this Court to establish that he has exhausted that Brady claim in State court. Such evidence, if any, must be provided to the Court on or before 2/15/2013, and attached to a letter / motion seeking reconsideration of this Memorandum and Order. Unless Petitioner moves for reconsideration, Petitioner shall have until 3/1/2013, in which to file an Amended Petition. Respond ent shall have until 3/29/2013, in which to file a response to that Petition, and Petitioner shall have until 4/15/2013, in which to file a reply. If Petitioner does not file an Amended Petition within the time allowed, this Court may proceed to adjudicate this action without further notice. Petitioner's 29 motion for stay and abeyance is denied without prejudice to renewing the motion. Petitioner's 25 motion for appointment of counsel is denied at this juncture. Petitioner's other motions are denied without prejudice. SO ORDERED by Judge Sandra L. Townes, on 1/24/2013. C/mailed to pro se Petitioner. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Scott v. Rock | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Rock | |
Represented By: | KINGS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE - GENERIC |
Represented By: | NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERALS OFFICE - GENERIC |
Represented By: | Shulamit Rosenblum Nemec |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Kwame Scott | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.