Griffith v. Police Detective John Doe 1 et al
Jeric Griffith |
Detective Charles Stewart, The City of New York, The NYPD and Sergeant Robert Caban |
Office of the Corporation Counsel of the City of New York |
1:2010cv06066 |
December 28, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Brooklyn Office |
Lois Bloom |
Brian M. Cogan |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 46 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER, granting Deft's 45 Motion to Dismiss and this case is dismissed with prejudice. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 USC sec. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. (Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 3/2/2012) c/m by chambers. Fwd. for Judgment. (Galeano, Sonia) |
Filing 36 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, Griffith has failed to comply with this Court's sanction Order. I therefore adopt the 32 recommendations set forth in Judge Bloom's R&R and grant 31 Motion to Dismiss f or Lack of Prosecution. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 USc sec. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. (Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 12/27/2011) c/m by chambers. Fwd. for Judgment. (Galeano, Sonia) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.