Soto v. Lene et al
| Efrain Soto |
| Stephanie V. Lene, Rosa Lene, John & Jane Doe Of Apt #2-E, Diana Lene, Felix Lene, John & Jane Doe and Brookdale Hospital/Shachne Bldg and Employees |
| 1:2011cv00089 |
| January 5, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Lois Bloom |
| Sandra L. Townes |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
3
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Plaintiff's 2 request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Plaintiff's 1 complaint is dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(b)(3) of the Fed. R. Civil Pr. and for failure to stat e a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. sec. 1915(e)(2)(B). The Court denies plaintiff's request for preliminary injunctive relief, and declines to allow plaintiff to amend the complaint as leave to amend would be futile. To the extent that plaintiff� 39;s complaint incorporates any state law claims, these state law claims are dismissed without prejudice to bringing them to State court. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. sec. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal form this Order would not be taken in good faith and, therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment and close this case. So Ordered by Judge Sandra L. Townes on 1/14/2011. C/M (Manuel, Germaine)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
