Kinojuz I.P. v. IRP International Inc. et al
Kinojuz I.P. |
Does, Oulian Doubinine, Igor Erlikh and IRP International Inc. |
1:2011cv00299 |
January 20, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Brooklyn Office |
Dora Lizette Irizarry |
Viktor V. Pohorelsky |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 128 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW determining that the defendants are liable to the plaintiff for $200,000 plus interest from December 5, 2007 and that the plaintiff is entitled to a declaration that the plaintiff has no liability to the d efendant Erlikh with respect to merchandise purportedly delivered to Kazakhstan. The clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly. See annexed for detailed explanation. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Viktor V. Pohorelsky on 10/12/2016. (Pohorelsky, Viktor) |
Filing 105 ORDER denying 97 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment -- For the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED WRITTEN MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment against defendants IRP International Inc. and Igor Erlikh is denie d. This matter is referred to the magistrate judge for further pretrial proceedings and settlement discussions. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Electronic Order and the Attached Written Memorandum and Order to pro se plaintiff. SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 3/26/2014. (Irizarry, Dora) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.