Alford v. The City Of New York. et al
Plaintiff: Douglas Alford
Defendant: Police Officers John Doe 1-8 and The City Of New York.
Shield #3785: Police Officer Daniel Gong
Tax Registration #942157: Police Officer Caleef Mclean
Case Number: 1:2011cv00622
Filed: February 8, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge: Marilyn D. Go
Presiding Judge: Edward R. Korman
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 29, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER granting 28 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Defendants 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss the § 1983 causes of action is granted. The pendent state law claims are dismissed without prejudice. Ordered by Judge Edward R. Korman on 8/29/2012. (Schwenk, Andrew)
March 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 29 Motion for Discovery Stay. The defendants' application for a stay is granted as to Monell discovery and denied in other respects. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Marilyn D. Go on 3/20/2012. (Proujansky, Josh)
July 26, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 17 Minute Entry and Order for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Marilyn D. Go on 7/26/11. Appearances by Wale Mosaku for plaintiff; Curt Beck for defendant. On consent, discovery is stayed pending disposition of the criminal proceeding arising out of plaintiff's 8/13/10 arrest. Rulings made on the record granting plaintiff's 10 motion for leave to amend, denying plaintiff's 14 motion for sanctions, denying without prejudice plaintiff's 15 motion for contempt and granting in part and denying in part defendants' 11 motion to compel as summarized in the attached order. (Tape #ESR 11/24 0-1961 and FTR/C 12:04-12:36.) (Proujansky, Josh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alford v. The City Of New York. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Shield #3785: Police Officer Daniel Gong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Police Officers John Doe 1-8
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The City Of New York.
Represented By: Curt Peter Beck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Douglas Alford
Represented By: Wale Mosaku
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Tax registration #942157: Police Officer Caleef Mclean
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?