Singh v. Bay Crane Service Inc.

Singh v. Bay Crane Service Inc.

Plaintiff:	Deochan Singh
Defendant:	Bay Crane Service Inc.
Case Number:	1:2011cv00720
Filed:	February 14, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge:	Raymond J. Dearie
Presiding Judge:	Ramon E. Reyes
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 3, 2015	Filing 62 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Defendant Bay Crane's 52 motion in limine is denied. Plaintiff Singh may admit into evidence the racial composition of Bay Crane's crane operators because (1) the evidence entails simple data that does n ot require expert analysis to be properly admitted, and (2) the evidence is relevant to claims of discriminatory intent in hiring for the Transit Project, and its probative value outweighs its prejudicial value. The parties shall review and modify t heir proposed jury instructions to ensure consistency with this opinion. Revised instructions shall be filed by 4/6/15. The parties are encouraged to enter into any stipulations of fact that could streamline the presentation of evidence and mitigate evidentiary disputes at trial. Ordered by Judge Raymond J. Dearie on 3/3/2015. (Chee, Alvin)
December 16, 2013	Filing 42 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Defendant Bay Crane's 40 motion for reconsideration is denied. Ordered by Judge Raymond J. Dearie on 12/11/2013. (Chee, Alvin)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 3, 2015

Filing 62 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Defendant Bay Crane's 52 motion in limine is denied. Plaintiff Singh may admit into evidence the racial composition of Bay Crane's crane operators because (1) the evidence entails simple data that does n ot require expert analysis to be properly admitted, and (2) the evidence is relevant to claims of discriminatory intent in hiring for the Transit Project, and its probative value outweighs its prejudicial value. The parties shall review and modify t heir proposed jury instructions to ensure consistency with this opinion. Revised instructions shall be filed by 4/6/15. The parties are encouraged to enter into any stipulations of fact that could streamline the presentation of evidence and mitigate evidentiary disputes at trial. Ordered by Judge Raymond J. Dearie on 3/3/2015. (Chee, Alvin)

December 16, 2013

Filing 42 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Defendant Bay Crane's 40 motion for reconsideration is denied. Ordered by Judge Raymond J. Dearie on 12/11/2013. (Chee, Alvin)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Singh v. Bay Crane Service Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Bay Crane Service Inc.
Represented By:	Daniel J. Kaiser
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Deochan Singh
Represented By:	Michael G. O'Neill
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?