Jones v. East Brooklyn Security Services Corp. et al
| Anthony Jones |
| Winchester Key and East Brooklyn Security Services Corp. |
| 1:2011cv01021 |
| March 2, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| John Gleeson |
| Steven M. Gold |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 23 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim: As explained in the attached Memorandum and Order, Jones's claim for fraud is dismissed for failure to state a claim; the defendants' motion is otherwise denied. Ordered by Judge John Gleeson on 8/7/2012. (Talbott, Rebecca)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; denying 9 Motion for Default Judgment: Please see the attached order adopting Judge Gold's 11 Report & Recommendation in full and denying plaintiff's 9 motion for default judgment. Plaintiff is hereby granted leave to file and serve, on or before April 14, 2012, an amended complaint alleging facts sufficient to impose FLSA liability against defendants. Plaintiff is hereby directed to serve a copy of this Order upon defendants at their last known address, and to file proof of service with the Court. Ordered by Judge John Gleeson on 3/16/2012. (Talbott, Rebecca)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
