Hand -vs- New York City Housing Preservation and Development

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Eastern District Hand -vs- New York City Housing Preservation and Development

Hand -vs- New York City Housing Preservation and Development

Plaintiff:	Deborah Hand
Defendant:	New York City Housing Preservation and Development
Case Number:	1:2011cv01076
Filed:	March 4, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge:	Roslynn R. Mauskopf
Presiding Judge:	James Orenstein
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 25, 2017	Filing 115 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: After de novo review of Magistrate Judge Orenstein's thorough and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation, as well as the factual and procedural record upon which it is based, and the parties' ; objections, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 106 ) in its entirety. Accordingly, Hand's motion to revoke the settlement (Doc. No. 96 ) is granted, and the City's cross-motion to enforce the settlement agreement ( Doc. No. 101 ) is denied. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Memorandum and Order to plaintiff, pro se, Deborah Hand and note the mailing on the docket. This action is re-committed to Magistrate Judge Orenstein for all remaining pre-trial matters. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 9/25/2017. (Taronji, Robert)
March 17, 2014	Filing 77 JUDGMENT in favor of New York City Housing Preservation and Development against Deborah Hand. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 3/17/2014. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 25, 2017

Filing 115 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: After de novo review of Magistrate Judge Orenstein's thorough and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation, as well as the factual and procedural record upon which it is based, and the parties' ; objections, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 106 ) in its entirety. Accordingly, Hand's motion to revoke the settlement (Doc. No. 96 ) is granted, and the City's cross-motion to enforce the settlement agreement ( Doc. No. 101 ) is denied. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Memorandum and Order to plaintiff, pro se, Deborah Hand and note the mailing on the docket. This action is re-committed to Magistrate Judge Orenstein for all remaining pre-trial matters. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 9/25/2017. (Taronji, Robert)

March 17, 2014

Filing 77 JUDGMENT in favor of New York City Housing Preservation and Development against Deborah Hand. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 3/17/2014. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hand -vs- New York City Housing Preservation and Development
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Deborah Hand
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: New York City Housing Preservation and Development
Represented By:	Celine J Chan
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?