Solomon et al v. Siemens Industry, Inc. et al
| Jane Solomon and Robert Solomon |
| Frank A. Kreutemeier, Siemens Energy & Automation and Siemens Industry, Inc. |
| 1:2011cv01321 |
| March 18, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Steven M. Gold |
| Dora Lizette Irizarry |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
218
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS -- On June 21, 2013, Chief Magistrate Judge Gold issued his Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), recommending that the Court grant defendants' motions for summary judgment and dismiss the action. (See R&R, Dkt. Entry No. 193.) Additionally, the magistrate judge denied Plaintiffs' motion to unseal certain documents filed in connection with these motions. Plaintiffs filed objections to the R&R and Defendants opposed. Upon due considerat ion, the Court hereby adopts the characteristically thorough, thoughtful and well-reasoned R&R of Chief Magistrate Judge Gold in its entirety. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED WRITTEN SUMMARY ORDER, plaintiffs' objections are overruled, defendants' motions for summary judgment are granted, the magistrate judge's order denying the unsealing of certain documents is affirmed and this action is DISMISSED. Defendants are directed to serve a copy of this Electroni c Order and the Attached Written Summary Order to pro se plaintiffs and immediately thereafter file proof of such service via ECF. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 3/26/2014. (Irizarry, Dora)
|
|
Filing
209
ORDER granting 195 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice: See attached Order granting the motion for the limited purpose of presenting plaintiffs' objections to the Report, but without prejudice to defendants' right to renew their opposition in the event the recommendations made in the Report are not adopted and the case survives defendants' summary judgment motion. Ordered by Chief Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold on 10/22/2013. (Giaimo, C.)
|
|
Filing
96
ORDER re 91 : I hereby clarify and reiterate that documents produced in discovery in this case under a designation of confidentiality may be publicly filed, if at all, only in this case, and only if the confidential designation is successfully cha llenged. If any documents are sought to be used, cited, or relied on in any way in other cases, they must be obtained in discovery whether from parties or non-parties in those other cases. Moreover, before documents may be publicly filed in this case, the procedure for notice and objections I ordered on January 27 must be followed, and the notice must identify the documents that the noticing party seeks to file on the public docket by Bates number or other similarly specific designation. SEE ATTACHED ORDER. So Ordered by Chief Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold on 2/28/2012. (O'Connor, Erin)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER re 67 Letter MOTION to Strike Order on Motion for Protective Order filed by Robert Solomon, Jane Solomon, First Keystone Consultants, Inc., 68 Response to Motion filed by Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP, Siemens Indus try, Inc. See Order directing plaintiffs to contact the Clerk of the Court and ensure that the documents and information designated as confidential by defendants are removed from the public record and re-filed, if at all, under seal by the close of business on December 30, 2011. Ordered by Chief Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold on 12/29/2011. (Gold, Steven)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER DENYING Plaintiffs' 5 Motion to Remand to State Court - For the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED WRITTEN MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, the court finds that removal of this action was proper. Accordingly, Plaintiffs' motion for remand is d enied. See 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a); Perez, 2011 WL 1636244 at *2. The court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the pu rpose of any appeal. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). This case shall proceed under the pretrial supervision of Chief Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Electronic Order and the Attached Written Memorandum Order to pro se plaintiffs. SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 7/18/2011. (Irizarry, Dora)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER granting 12 Motion to Compel for the reasons stated in the attached Order. Plaintiffs shall file a complaint that complies with Rule 8(a)(2) no later than July 8, 2011. The initial conference previously scheduled for June 29th is adjourned to 3:00 p.m. on July 19, 2011. Ordered by Chief Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold on 6/16/2011. (O'Connor, Erin)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
