Torres v. Toback, Bernstein & Reiss LLP et al
| Leilani Torres |
| Brian K Bernstein, Loraine Campbell, John Does 1-10, Leonard S Reiss, Arthur M Toback and Toback, Bernstein & Reiss LLP |
| 1:2011cv01368 |
| March 21, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Nicholas G. Garaufis |
| Viktor V. Pohorelsky |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
107
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting 105 Motion for Attorney Fees; granting 106 Motion for Attorney Fees. See annexed opinion for details. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Viktor V. Pohorelsky on 1/23/2017. (Pohorelsky, Viktor)
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER re REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: For the foregoing reasons, the R&R's recommendations that (1) the class be conditionally certified as two sub-classes for the purpose of settlement, and (2) Plaintiff's counsel be appointed as Class Counsel are ADOPTED WITH MODIFICATIONS contained herein. As for the R&R's recommendations that (3) preliminary approval of the proposed settlement be granted, and (4) the class notice be approved, the court A DOPTS the findings of the R&R but RESERVES DECISION pending the parties' submission. By April 11, 2014, the parties shall file with the court a revised settlement, class notice, and conditional order addressing the modifications discussed in the R&R and this Order. So Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 3/29/2014. (Lee, Tiffeny)
|
|
Filing
48
OPINION AND ORDER -- The plaintiff has moved to compel the defendants to produce the retainer agreement between the defendant Toback, Bernstein & Reiss LLP (Toback Bernstein) and its client, Columbia University, pursuant to which the defendant perfor med the debt collection services at issue in this litigation. In addition, the court has been asked to address whether the attorney-client privilege has been properly asserted by the defendants with respect to a number of documents that have been submitted for in camera review. The plaintiff's motion to compel production of the retainer agreement is granted. See annexed order for details. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Viktor V. Pohorelsky on 1/24/12. (Newton, Joan)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
