Yung v. Trump
| J. Taikwok Yung |
| Donald J. Trump |
| Donald J. Trump |
| J. Taikwok Yung |
| 1:2011cv01413 |
| March 22, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Dora Lizette Irizarry |
| Viktor V. Pohorelsky |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
90
ORDER denying 84 Motion for Reconsideration -- For the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED WRITTEN SUMMARY ORDER, Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration is denied. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and, therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Electronic Order and the Attached Written Summary Order to pro se plaintiff. SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 3/3/2015. (Irizarry, Dora)
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS -- On February 28, 2014, the Hon. Viktor V. Pohorelsky issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") as to defendant's motion for damages and pro se plaintiff's motion for leave to fil e a sur-reply. Plaintiff timely objected and defendant opposed. For the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED WRITTEN SUMMARY ORDER, and, upon due consideration, plaintiff's objections are overruled and the R&R is adopted in its entirety. Accordi ngly, it is hereby ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff's motion for leave to file a sur-reply is denied; (2) defendant's motion for damages is granted; (3) defendant is awarded $8,000.00 per infringing domain name for a total judgment against plaintiff of $32,000.00; and plaintiff is ORDERED to transfer his interest in the domain names trumpmumbai.com, trumpindia.com, trumpbeijing.com, and trumpabudhabi.com to defendant within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Defendant is directed to serve a copy of this Electronic Order and the Attached Written Summary Order on pro se plaintiff within five days of the date of this Order and immediately thereafter file proof of such service with the Court via ECF. This case was previously ordered closed by Court Order. SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 3/26/2014. (Irizarry, Dora)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 38 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment -- For the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED WRITTEN OPINION AND ORDER, Defendant's motion for summary judgment is granted with respect to his ACPA counterclai m and Plaintiff's ACPA declaratory judgment claim. In addition, the court: 1) denies as moot Defendant's motion for summary judgment on his federal and state trademark infringement and federal and state unfair competition counterclaims be cause of the court's holding that Defendant is entitled to relief under the ACPA; and 2) dismisses as moot Plaintiff's claim seeking a declaration that the Domain Names do not infringe on Defendant's trademark. The court certifies pur suant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and, therefore, in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 44445 ( 1962). In light of the court's ruling, the complaint is DISMISSED. However, the closure of this case is held in abeyance as Defendant seeks injunctive relief and other damages. Accordingly, no later than March 28, 2013, defendant shall file w ith the court a proposed permanent injunction order and its motion for damages. Defendant is reminded to provide hard courtesy copies to chambers immediately upon filing these documents. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Electronic Order and the Attached Written Opinion and Order to pro se plaintiff. SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 2/28/2013. (Irizarry, Dora)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
