Chapman v. State of New York (NYS Division of Parole) et al
| Thomas Chapman |
| M. Raynor and State of New York (NYS Division of Parole) |
| 1:2011cv01814 |
| April 13, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Lois Bloom |
| Eric N. Vitaliano |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM AND CIVIL JUDGMENT, that final judgment be, and hereby is, entered for defts. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 USC sec. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Memorandum and Judgment would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. (Ordered by Judge Eric N. Vitaliano on 11/1/2011) c/m Appeals Package sent to Pltff.
|
|
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM & ORDER: Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 is granted. Plaintiff's claims against the State of New York and the New York State Division of Parole are dismissed with p rejudice. Plaintiff's claim against defendant Raynor is dismissed without prejudice, and plaintiff shall have 30 days from the entry of this Order to file an amended complaint. SO ORDERED by Judge Eric N. Vitaliano, on 9/7/2011. C/mailed to pro se Plaintiff. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
