NYTDA, Inc. v. The City Of New York. et al
NYTDA, Inc. |
David M. Frankel, Stephen Goldsmith, John and Jane Does 1-10, The City Of New York., James Tuller and Harry J. Wedin |
1:2011cv01836 |
April 14, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Brooklyn Office |
Nicholas G. Garaufis |
Marilyn D. Go |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 120 ORDER denying 118 Motion to Stay. Defendants' motion for a stay is DENIED. This case will move forward. The briefing schedule previously set for Lockman's motion for class certification remains in place. However, due to the clear stat ement of Second Circuit law set forth in Tanasi, Defendants' anticipated motion to dismiss is no longer tenable. See Tanasi v. New Alliance Bank, No. 14-1389, --- F.3d ----, 2015 WL 2251472, at *1, *4 (2d Cir. May 21, 2015) (amended opinion). Accordingly, in light of Tanasi, the court RESCINDS its prior Order granting leave to file the motion to dismiss; leave to file the motion to dismiss is DENIED at this time without prejudice. Additionally, Defendants 039; request to file a motion for the court to enter judgment in the amount of Defendants' Rule 68 offer is GRANTED, and the motion shall proceed in accordance with the following briefing schedule: Defendants shall serve their motion by September 17, 2015; Lockman shall serve its opposition by October 15, 2015; and Defendants shall serve their reply, if any, and file the fully briefed motion by October 29, 2015. Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 6/17/2015. (Day, Lori) |
Filing 96 ORDER granting 91 Motion to Intervene. Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 8/28/2014. (King, Alyssa) |
Filing 85 MEMORANDUM & ORDER: Plaintiff's 47 Motion for Preliminary Injunction and for other equitable relief is DENIED. So Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 1/18/2013. (Lee, Tiffeny) |
Filing 27 ORDER: The court has considered the City's motion to dismiss (Docket Entry # 15), and that motion is DENIED. As demonstrated by its decision to attach multiple affidavits to its motion, the City primarily disputes the truth of the plaintiff' ;s allegations rather than the sufficiency of the complaint. The parties are directed to move forward expeditiously with discovery under the supervision of Magistrate Judge Marilyn D. Go. So Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 11/09/2011. (Lee, Tiffeny) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.