Samtani v. Cherukuri et al
Plaintiff: Sunil Samtani
Defendant: Ramakrishna Cherukuri and New York Fragrance, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2011cv02159
Filed: May 4, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge: Carol Bagley Amon
Presiding Judge: Ramon E. Reyes
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 5, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 54 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re 40 : For the above reasons, Cherukuri's motion for summary judgment is granted with respect to Samtani's IIED claim, but denied with respect to the malicious prosecution claim. Ordered by Chief Judge Carol Bagley Amon on 12/31/14. (fwd for judgment) (Fernandez, Erica)
May 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 37 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons stated above, the Court finds that the interests of sound judicial administration will not be served by entering final judgment on the § 1983 claims, nor has Samtani shown that his is the "infrequent h arsh case" where he would suffer some "hardship or injustice through delay which would be alleviated by immediate appeal." Accordingly,Samtani's Rule 54(b) motion is denied. Ordered by Chief Judge Carol Bagley Amon on 5/17/2013. (Fernandez, Erica)
May 18, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER granting 28 Motion for Reconsideration re 26 Order on Motion to Dismiss. The Court overlooked that the complaint alleges that this Court has diversity jurisdiction over the plaintiff's state law claims. The Court withdraws the por tion of it's May 11, 2012 Order declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the plaintiff's state law claims, and the plaintiff's state law claims are hereby reinstated. The defendants' motion to dismiss the plaintiff's claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress is denied. The Clerk of Court is directed to vacate 27 the judgment previously entered in this action. Ordered by Chief Judge Carol Bagley Amon on 5/18/2012. (Turner-Dodge, Lee)
May 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER granting 14 16 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. The Court finds that plaintiff has failed adequately to allege that the defendants are state actors, and the plaintiff's complaint is therefore dismissed in its entirety. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment and close this case. Ordered by Chief Judge Carol Bagley Amon on 5/09/2012.(Turner-Dodge, Lee)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Samtani v. Cherukuri et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sunil Samtani
Represented By: Joshua Fitch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ramakrishna Cherukuri
Represented By: Bruce Yukelson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: New York Fragrance, Inc.
Represented By: Bruce Yukelson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?