Eze v. City University of New York at Brooklyn College et al
Sophia Chinemerem Ihuo Eze |
Liaison Officer Robert Scott, City University of New York at Brooklyn College, Lieutenant Harry Gomez, Karen Lee Gould, Lieutenant Cynthia Hunter, Jane Doe, John Doe, Assistant Professor Sally Robles, Deputy Director Ursula G. Chase, Brooklyn College Campus and Community Safety Services (BCCSS), Advisor Jaime Weiss and Director Donald Wenz |
1:2011cv02454 |
May 20, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Brooklyn Office |
John Gleeson |
Cheryl L. Pollak |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 85 ORDER denying 65 Motion for Summary Judgment; declining to adopt 81 Report and Recommendations. For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum & Order, the Court declines to adopt Judge Pollak's report and recommendation and denies defendants' motion for summary judgment. Ordered by Judge Margo K. Brodie on 3/31/2014. (Ramos, Christopher) |
Filing 33 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 22 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim: As explained in the memorandum and order, the motion to dismiss is denied with respect to Eze's claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against defendants Scott and Robles arising from Eze's alleged detention and transport to Kings County Psychiatric Hospital. In all other respects, the motion to dismiss is granted. Ordered by Judge John Gleeson on 12/27/2011. (Gonen, Daniel) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.