Carter et al v. Amtrust Bank et al
Plaintiff: Shelly Carter and Vincent Carter
Defendant: John Doe # 1-5 and Amtrust Bank
Case Number: 1:2011cv02639
Filed: May 31, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge: Lois Bloom
Presiding Judge: Allyne R. Ross
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 27, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 5 OPINION & ORDER: By Order dated 6/13/2011, the Court noted that although both plaintiffs signed the complaint, only Shelly Carter completed and signed the in forma pauperis ("IFP") application. Vincent Carter, was directed to complete, sign and submit to the Court an application to proceed in forma pauperis, within 14 days of the date of this 3 Order. The Order further stated that if Vincent Carter failed to submit a completed and signed in forma paup eris application within the time allowed, the instant complaint shall be dismissed as to Vincent Carter, without prejudice. On 6/22/2011, the Court's 6/13/2011 Order, which was sent to the address provided by plaintiffs, was returned by the United States Postal Service as undeliverable. As plaintiffs have not provided the Court with a proper mailing address, the Court has no way of contacting plaintiffs and has no choice but to dismiss plaintiffs' complaint. Here, plaintiffs have not taken any steps to pursue this action since it was first filed on 5/31/2011. Nor have plaintiffs contacted the Court to provide a current address. It appears that plaintiffs have abandoned this action. Accordingly, it IS ORDERED, ADJUDGE D AND DECREED that the complaint is hereby dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore in f orma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. SO ORDERED by Senior Judge Allyne R. Ross, on 9/27/2011. C/mailed by Chambers. (Forwarded for Judgment) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carter et al v. Amtrust Bank et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shelly Carter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Vincent Carter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe # 1-5
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amtrust Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?