Gamez v. U.S. District Court Eastern and Southern Districts Tyranny New York et al
| Ricardo Brooks Gamez |
| Governor Cuomo, Mr. Gleeson and All Judges Who Have Dismissed Plaintiffs Cases. From 7to 8 Months Ago All The Way Back to 2003, U.S. District Court Eastern and Southern Districts Tyranny New York, V.P. Biden, Elliot Spitzer and A.G. Holder |
| 1:2011cv04068 |
| August 19, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Lois Bloom |
| Kiyo A. Matsumoto |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
3
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The Court grants plaintiff's 2 request to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 for the purpose of this Order, and dismisses the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which rel ief may be granted and as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(b)(i). The Court notifies plaintiff that if he persists in filing frivolous or malicious actions, he may face future filing restrictions. The Court certifies pursua nt to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. SO ORDERED by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto, on 9/6/2011. C/mailed. (Forwarded for Judgment) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
