Brown v. United States of America

Brown v. United States of America

Petitioner:	William Brown
Respondent:	United States of America
Case Number:	1:2011cv04235
Filed:	August 30, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge:	Nicholas G. Garaufis
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 11, 2018	Filing 30 ORDER, Petitioner's Motion to Vacate or modify his restitution order or to modify his restitution payment schedule 29 is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully DIRECTED to mail a copy of this order by certified mail, return receipt requested, to pro se Petitioner at his address of record. So Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 5/10/2018. (c/m as directed, certified mail receipt no. 7018 0360 0000 7907 8525) (Lee, Tiffeny)
April 20, 2015	Filing 25 ORDER on Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255). Brown's petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is DENIED as time-barred. Additionally, Brown's motion for release on bond pending full review of his habeas petition (Dkt. 19; Trial Dkt. 4 75) is DENIED as moot. Because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, no certificate of appealability shall issue. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment and close this case. So Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 4/17/2015. (fwd'd for jgm; c/m to pro se) (Lee, Tiffeny)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 11, 2018

Filing 30 ORDER, Petitioner's Motion to Vacate or modify his restitution order or to modify his restitution payment schedule 29 is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully DIRECTED to mail a copy of this order by certified mail, return receipt requested, to pro se Petitioner at his address of record. So Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 5/10/2018. (c/m as directed, certified mail receipt no. 7018 0360 0000 7907 8525) (Lee, Tiffeny)

April 20, 2015

Filing 25 ORDER on Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255). Brown's petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is DENIED as time-barred. Additionally, Brown's motion for release on bond pending full review of his habeas petition (Dkt. 19; Trial Dkt. 4 75) is DENIED as moot. Because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, no certificate of appealability shall issue. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment and close this case. So Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 4/17/2015. (fwd'd for jgm; c/m to pro se) (Lee, Tiffeny)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brown v. United States of America
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: William Brown
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?