United States of America v. Hines et al
| United States of America |
| Rodney N. Chestnut |
| Nafeesah H. Hines |
| 1:2011cv05080 |
| October 19, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Marilyn D. Go |
| Kiyo A. Matsumoto |
| Taxes |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 USA Plaintiff |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, the court sustains the government's objections to the Protective Order in part and overrules them in part. The court respectfully refers the case back to Mag istrate Judge Go for further proceedings and supervision of discovery. The government is directed to serve a copy of this Memorandum and Order on the pro se defendants and file a certificate of service by October 19, 2012. Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 10/17/2012. (Ravi, Sagar)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER granting 10 Motion for Discovery; granting 13 Motion for Discovery subject to the limitations discussed in the attached order. Plaintiff must promptly serve defendants with the discovery proposed and defendants must respond within thirty days after being served. Defendants are warned that failure to comply could result in sanctions. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Marilyn D. Go on 7/20/2012. (Proujansky, Josh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
