Cameron v. Smith

Cameron v. Smith

Petitioner:	Allan Cameron
Respondent:	Joseph T. Smith
Case Number:	1:2011cv05100
Filed:	October 17, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge:	Brian M. Cogan
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 23, 2012	Filing 23 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER, For the reasons set forth above and in the Court's 12/21/2011 Decision, the petition is denied and the case is dismissed. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment against petitioner. A Certificate of Appealability s hall not issue. Further, the Court certifies pursuant to 28 USC sec. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. (Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 3/22/2012) c/m with Unpublished Decisions sent to Petitioner by chambers. Fwd. for Judgment. (Galeano, Sonia)
December 21, 2011	Filing 16 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER, Based upon the rulings set forth herein, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1) That portion of Point I of the petition that alleges a Miranda violation and Point III of the petition are DENIED. 2) Petitioner shall show ca use within 30 days why the remaining portion of Point I (the Payton claim) is cognizable on habeas corpus review; 3) Respondent shall submit opposition to Point II of the Petition within 30 days; and 4) The parties may reply to each other's subm issions within 30 days of their respective submissions. No judgment shall enter at this time. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 USC sec. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis sta tus is denied for the purpose of an appeal. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this decision to petitioner pro se together with a copy of any unreported cases cited herein. (Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 12/21/2011) c/m by chambers to petitioner with unpublished decision. (Galeano, Sonia)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 23, 2012

Filing 23 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER, For the reasons set forth above and in the Court's 12/21/2011 Decision, the petition is denied and the case is dismissed. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment against petitioner. A Certificate of Appealability s hall not issue. Further, the Court certifies pursuant to 28 USC sec. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. (Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 3/22/2012) c/m with Unpublished Decisions sent to Petitioner by chambers. Fwd. for Judgment. (Galeano, Sonia)

December 21, 2011

Filing 16 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER, Based upon the rulings set forth herein, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1) That portion of Point I of the petition that alleges a Miranda violation and Point III of the petition are DENIED. 2) Petitioner shall show ca use within 30 days why the remaining portion of Point I (the Payton claim) is cognizable on habeas corpus review; 3) Respondent shall submit opposition to Point II of the Petition within 30 days; and 4) The parties may reply to each other's subm issions within 30 days of their respective submissions. No judgment shall enter at this time. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 USC sec. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis sta tus is denied for the purpose of an appeal. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this decision to petitioner pro se together with a copy of any unreported cases cited herein. (Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 12/21/2011) c/m by chambers to petitioner with unpublished decision. (Galeano, Sonia)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cameron v. Smith
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Joseph T. Smith
Represented By:	KINGS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE - GENERIC
Represented By:	NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERALS OFFICE - GENERIC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Allan Cameron
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?