Creddille v. MTA NYC Transit Authority et al
Plaintiff: Gary Creddille
Defendant: Core Environmental Corp. and MTA NYC Transit Authority
Case Number: 1:2011cv05442
Filed: November 3, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge: Roanne L. Mann
Presiding Judge: Sandra L. Townes
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 66 MEMORANDUM & ORDER denying 53 Motion for Recusal. For the reasons in the attached Memorandum & Order, the Court denies plaintiff's motion for recusal. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Roanne L. Mann on 2/20/2013. (Williams, Jennifer)
February 6, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 56 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, As described, Pltff's motion is based only on judicial rulings. Moreover, Pltff has not explained why the court's order consolidating the three actions for discovery purposes was in any way prejudicial to him nor has h e produced a single scintilla of evidence to demonstrate favortism or antagonism that would render a fair judgment almost impossible. Given that Pltff's objections amount to nothing more than dissatisfaction with the Court's order, recusal is unwarranted. Accordingly, Pltff's 53 Motion for Recusal is DENIED. (Ordered by Judge Sandra L. Townes on 2/6/2013) c/m (Galeano, Sonia)
June 26, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 35 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting (34) Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery in case 1:11-cv-05443-SLT-RLM; granting (34) Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery in case 1:11-cv-05442-SLT-RLM; granting (34) Motion for Extensio n of Time to Complete Discovery in case 1:11-cv-05444-SLT-RLM. For the reasons stated in this Court's Memorandum and Order, defendants jointly request a 120-day extension of the July 13th fact discovery deadline, reportedly with the consent of pro se plaintiff Gary Creddille. The motion for extension of time is granted, with fact discovery extended until November 9, 2012. The Court similarly adjourns the July 23rd settlement conference until November 16, 2012, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom 13C-S. Plaintiff is directed to serve his initial disclosures by July 6, 2012. A copy of Rule 26 is being forwarded to plaintiff with this Order. Any questions regarding the requirements of Rule 26(a)(1) should be addressed to the Pro Se Clerk's Office, 718-613-2665. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Roanne L. Mann on 6/26/2012. (Maynard, Pat)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Creddille v. MTA NYC Transit Authority et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Core Environmental Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MTA NYC Transit Authority
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gary Creddille
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?