Trustees of the Pension and Welfare Funds of the Moving Picture Machine Operators Union, Local 306 v. Queens Circuit Management Corp. et al
Trustees of the Pension and Welfare Funds of the Moving Picture Machine Operators Union, Local 306 |
Jose Diaz, Manuel Diaz and Queens Circuit Management Corp. |
1:2011cv05882 |
December 2, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Brooklyn Office |
Steven M. Gold |
Dora Lizette Irizarry |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 73 ORDER denying 63 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings without prejudice to renew after completing the further steps described in the attached Order. Ordered by Chief Mag. Judge Steven M. Gold on 3/19/2015. (Gold, Steven) |
Filing 23 ORDER re Order Referring Motion: For the reasons stated in the attached Order, and absent further application by plaintiffs filed no later than March 23, 2012, this Court will terminate plaintiffs' motion for default judgment against Jose Dia z, without prejudice to plaintiffs' right to renew the motion after any determination of liability and damages with respect to defendants QCM and Manuel Diaz. Plaintiffs shall promptly serve a copy of the attached Order on Jose Diaz at his last known address. So Ordered by Chief Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold on 3/9/2012. (O'Connor, Erin) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.