Martin v. Westlake Financial Services et al
| Vernice Martin |
| Westlake Financial Services, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Jersey City Ford Lincoln Mercury and Capital One Bank of Jersey City |
| 1:2011cv06345 |
| December 27, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Carol Bagley Amon |
| Robert M. Levy |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Accordingly, the action is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Carol Bagley Amon, on 4/16/2012. C/mailed. (Forwarded for Judgment.) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
|
|
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The Court grants plaintiff thirty (30) days from the date of this Order to file a Second Amended Complaint that properly asserts a basis for the exercise of this Courts jurisdiction. No summons will issue at this time and all further proceedings shall be stayed for thirty (30) days or until plaintiff has complied with this Order. Ordered by Chief Judge Carol Bagley Amon on 1/23/2012. c/m to pro se plaintiff. (Amon, Carol)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
