Shariff v. Radamar Meat Corp.

Shariff v. Radamar Meat Corp.

Plaintiff:	Abdul Shariff
Defendant:	Radamar Meat Corp.
Case Number:	1:2011cv06369
Filed:	December 29, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge:	Nicholas G. Garaufis
Presiding Judge:	Robert M. Levy
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 31, 2014	Filing 20 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS in part and modified in part. The court GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment and ISSUES an injunction ordering defendant to provide accessible parking spaces at the subject premises in co mpliance with the ADA and the ADAAG. Defendant shall submit to Plaintiff's counsel an architectural plan that remedies the ADAAG violations identified in the Second R&R within sixty (60) days of this Order. Pl aintiff has thirty (30) days from receipt of Defendant's plans to consent or to seek further relief from the court. Defendant is directed to make the necessary alterations within sixty (60) days of Plaintiff's consent or any r uling on Plaintiffs request for further relief. The court AWARDS Plaintiff $1,100, representing $1,000 in compensatory damages and $100 in statutory damages. Plaintiff's request for an award of attorney's fe es and costs are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and Plaintiff's counsel is permitted to submit an appropriate supplemental sworn statement and billing records within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. So Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 3/28/2014. (Lee, Tiffeny)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 31, 2014

Filing 20 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS in part and modified in part. The court GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment and ISSUES an injunction ordering defendant to provide accessible parking spaces at the subject premises in co mpliance with the ADA and the ADAAG. Defendant shall submit to Plaintiff's counsel an architectural plan that remedies the ADAAG violations identified in the Second R&R within sixty (60) days of this Order. Pl aintiff has thirty (30) days from receipt of Defendant's plans to consent or to seek further relief from the court. Defendant is directed to make the necessary alterations within sixty (60) days of Plaintiff's consent or any r uling on Plaintiffs request for further relief. The court AWARDS Plaintiff $1,100, representing $1,000 in compensatory damages and $100 in statutory damages. Plaintiff's request for an award of attorney's fe es and costs are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and Plaintiff's counsel is permitted to submit an appropriate supplemental sworn statement and billing records within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. So Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 3/28/2014. (Lee, Tiffeny)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shariff v. Radamar Meat Corp.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Radamar Meat Corp.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Abdul Shariff
Represented By:	James E. Bahamonde
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?