Twine v. United States of America

Twine v. United States of America

Petitioner:	Sylvester Twine
Respondent:	United States of America
Case Number:	1:2012cv00227
Filed:	January 13, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge:	Dora Lizette Irizarry
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 10, 2014	Filing 17 ORDER DENYING PETITION TO AMEND/CORRECT SENTENCE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2255 - For the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED WRITTEN MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, the Petition for relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is denied in its entirety. Petition er is further denied a certificate of appealability as he fails to make a "substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); see Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); MillerEl v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Lucidore v. New York State Div. of Parole, 209 F.3d 107, 112 (2d Cir. 2000). The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and, therefore, in forma paup eris status is denied for purpose of any appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 44445 (1962). The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Electronic Order to pro se Petitioner and to close this case. SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 1/10/2014. (Irizarry, Dora)
July 18, 2012	Filing 13 ORDER denying 8 Motion to Compel Recusal - For the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED WRITTEN SUMMARY ORDER, Petitioner's recusal motion is denied. The court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be take n in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Petitioner's request that he be provided with a copy of the Docket Sheet in this ca se is granted. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Electronic Order, the Attached Written Summary Order and a copy of the docket sheet in this case to pro se Petitioner. SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 7/18/2012. (Irizarry, Dora)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 10, 2014

Filing 17 ORDER DENYING PETITION TO AMEND/CORRECT SENTENCE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2255 - For the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED WRITTEN MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, the Petition for relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is denied in its entirety. Petition er is further denied a certificate of appealability as he fails to make a "substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); see Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); MillerEl v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Lucidore v. New York State Div. of Parole, 209 F.3d 107, 112 (2d Cir. 2000). The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and, therefore, in forma paup eris status is denied for purpose of any appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 44445 (1962). The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Electronic Order to pro se Petitioner and to close this case. SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 1/10/2014. (Irizarry, Dora)

July 18, 2012

Filing 13 ORDER denying 8 Motion to Compel Recusal - For the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED WRITTEN SUMMARY ORDER, Petitioner's recusal motion is denied. The court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be take n in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Petitioner's request that he be provided with a copy of the Docket Sheet in this ca se is granted. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail a copy of this Electronic Order, the Attached Written Summary Order and a copy of the docket sheet in this case to pro se Petitioner. SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 7/18/2012. (Irizarry, Dora)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Twine v. United States of America
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Sylvester Twine
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?