S.A. v. New York City Department of Education
||New York City Department of Education
||January 31, 2012
||New York Eastern District Court
||Marilyn D. Go
||Roslynn R. Mauskopf
|Nature of Suit:
||Civil Rights: Education
|Cause of Action:
||28:1331 Fed. Question
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|March 30, 2014
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 33 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 37 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 45 Motion for Leave to File. For the reasons stated in the attached Memor andum and Order, With respect to all issues other than compensatory parental training, the SRO's decision is affirmed, plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment is denied, and DOE's cross-motion for summary judgment is granted. However, to the extent the SRO annulled the IHO's award of compensatory parental training, plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is granted, DOE's cross-motion for summary judgment is denied; as such, the SRO's decision is reversed in part, a nd the IHO's award of compensatory training is reinstated. The Court orders the parties to confer and submit within 14 days of the date of this Memorandum and Order a proposed judgment consistent with the Court's ruling herein. The Court further orders the parties to confer on the subject of attorneys fees in an effort to reach an agreement. In the absence of such agreement, the parties are to notify the Court no later than June 1, 2014, and propose a briefing schedule on the application. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 3/30/2014. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.