Barroso v. CUNY

Barroso v. CUNY

Plaintiff:	Fernando Barroso
Defendant:	CUNY
Case Number:	1:2012cv00625
Filed:	February 6, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge:	Joan M. Azrack
Presiding Judge:	Roslynn R. Mauskopf
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 22, 2014	Filing 27 JUDGMENT in favor of CUNY against Fernando Barroso. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 9/22/2014. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)
August 9, 2013	Filing 18 ORDER granting 9 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim with leave to replead: For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, defendants motion to dismiss is GRANTED and plaintiffs claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. In light of this Courts duty to liberally construe pro se complaints, plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint alleging viable claims consistent with this opinion. Should plaintiff elect to file an amended complaint, he must do so by September 5, 2013. Any filing must be clearly captioned Amended Complaint, and bear the same docket number 12-cv-625 as the original complaint. If plaintiff fails to amend his complaint within the time allowed, this action shall be dismissed and judgment shall enter.The Clerk of Court shall mail a copy of this Memorandum and Order to the plaintiff by overnight mail and note the mailing on the docket. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 8/9/2013. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 22, 2014

Filing 27 JUDGMENT in favor of CUNY against Fernando Barroso. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 9/22/2014. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)

August 9, 2013

Filing 18 ORDER granting 9 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim with leave to replead: For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, defendants motion to dismiss is GRANTED and plaintiffs claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. In light of this Courts duty to liberally construe pro se complaints, plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint alleging viable claims consistent with this opinion. Should plaintiff elect to file an amended complaint, he must do so by September 5, 2013. Any filing must be clearly captioned Amended Complaint, and bear the same docket number 12-cv-625 as the original complaint. If plaintiff fails to amend his complaint within the time allowed, this action shall be dismissed and judgment shall enter.The Clerk of Court shall mail a copy of this Memorandum and Order to the plaintiff by overnight mail and note the mailing on the docket. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 8/9/2013. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barroso v. CUNY
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fernando Barroso
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: CUNY
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?