Kearney et al v. Cavalry Portfolio Services LLC et al
| Gwendolyn Bird, Laurie Goldstein, Janice Kearney and Samantha Rodriguez |
| Cavalry Portfolio Services LLC, Cavalry SPV I LLC, Choic Law Office PLLC, Craig Faye, Danielle C. Choi, John Does #1-10, Schacter Portney, LLC and Thomas Law Offices PLLC |
| 1:2012cv00860 |
| February 22, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Dora Lizette Irizarry |
| Robert M. Levy |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
85
ORDER denying 78 Motion for Reconsideration -- For the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED WRITTEN MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration is denied in its entirety. This case was previously closed by court order. SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 3/30/2015. (Irizarry, Dora)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER granting 51 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting 72 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney - Attorney Rachel Marin terminated -- For the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED WRITTEN MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint is granted in its entirety. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendants and to close this case. SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 7/31/2014. (Irizarry, Dora)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
