Bellamy v. City of New York et al
| Kareem Bellamy |
| City of New York, John J. Gillen, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and Michael F. Solomeno |
| 1:2012cv01025 |
| March 1, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Viktor V. Pohorelsky |
| William F. Kuntz |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
200
ORDER granting 155 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 162 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment: For the reasons set out in the associated memorandum and order, the defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted in its entirety, and t he claims against the individual defendants are dismissed. The Monell claims against the City of New York are dismissed as a matter of law. Thus, the action is dismissed in its entirety. Ordered by Judge Ann M Donnelly on 5/17/2017. (Goeke, Justine) (Main Document 200 replaced on 5/17/2017) (Greene, Donna).
|
|
Filing
138
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo. Status Conference held on 2/16/2016. Attorney Thomas Hoffman appeared on behalf of plaintiff. Attorney Matthew J. Modafferi appeared on behalf of defendants. Jonat han Hiles, a law student working at the firm of Thomas Hoffman, was also present. Argument was heard on 122 Motion for Protective Order. Motion denied. Details of the Court's ruling are annexed at 138 . The Court allows the depositions of t he witnesses listed on 125 -Exhibit 1 to go forward, except that the number of witnesses is limited to 10. Since plaintiff's counsel has withdrawn Judge Blumenfeld and Robert Masters from the list at this time, plaintiff's counsel must ta ke one more witness off the list. Plaintiff is advised to attempt to limit the number of witnesses further as depositions proceed. Plaintiff is also directed to provide information to defendants' counsel in advance regarding the scope of the pro posed deposition testimony, cases the witness may be asked about, and documents that may be used in the deposition. Plaintiff's oral request to exceed the page limit by filing a twelve (12) page motion to compel discovery is granted. The deadl ine for filing that motion is February 19, 2016. Defendants are also granted leave to file a twelve (12) page response by March 4, 2016. Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Defendants' Reply 129 is denied. The next status conference will be held on March 14, 2016 at 3:00 p.m., in Courtroom 322 North, before Magistrate Judge Peggy Kuo. (Tape #11:24-12:08.) (Feldman, Shira)
|
|
Filing
103
MEMORANDUM ORDER granting in part and denying in part 75 Motion to Compel. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Viktor V. Pohorelsky on 5/22/2015. (Pohorelsky, Viktor)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
