Brown v. Guardsmark, LLC

Brown v. Guardsmark, LLC

Plaintiff:	Paul W. Brown
Defendant:	Guardsmark, LLC
Case Number:	1:2012cv01538
Filed:	March 26, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge:	Carol Bagley Amon
Presiding Judge:	Marilyn D. Go
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 16, 2012	Filing 5 TRANSFER MEMORANDUM & ORDER: Venue is not proper in this district under Title VII. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(t)(3). Accordingly, this action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. 28 U. S.C. § 1406(a). The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Carol Bagley Amon on 5/16/2012. C/mailed to pro se Plaintiff. Case transferred electronically to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia via CM/ECF Extract Civil Case. ALL FILINGS ARE TO BE MADE IN THE TRANSFER COURT, DO NOT DOCKET TO THIS CASE. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
April 30, 2012	Filing 3 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Plaintiff's 2 request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 solely for the purpose of this Order. Plaintiff is hereby directed to show cause why this action should not be transf erred to the Eastern District of Virginia within 30 days from the date of this Order. All further proceedings shall be stayed for 30 days or until plaintiff has complied with this Order. If plaintiff fails to respond to this order within 30 days, the action shall be transferred to the Eastern District of Virginia. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Carol Bagley Amon, on 4/30/2012. C/mailed to pro se Plaintiff. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 16, 2012

Filing 5 TRANSFER MEMORANDUM & ORDER: Venue is not proper in this district under Title VII. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(t)(3). Accordingly, this action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. 28 U. S.C. § 1406(a). The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Carol Bagley Amon on 5/16/2012. C/mailed to pro se Plaintiff. Case transferred electronically to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia via CM/ECF Extract Civil Case. ALL FILINGS ARE TO BE MADE IN THE TRANSFER COURT, DO NOT DOCKET TO THIS CASE. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)

April 30, 2012

Filing 3 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Plaintiff's 2 request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 solely for the purpose of this Order. Plaintiff is hereby directed to show cause why this action should not be transf erred to the Eastern District of Virginia within 30 days from the date of this Order. All further proceedings shall be stayed for 30 days or until plaintiff has complied with this Order. If plaintiff fails to respond to this order within 30 days, the action shall be transferred to the Eastern District of Virginia. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Carol Bagley Amon, on 4/30/2012. C/mailed to pro se Plaintiff. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brown v. Guardsmark, LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Paul W. Brown
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Guardsmark, LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?