Chopen v. Olive Vine, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Pablo Valerio Chopen
Defendant: Zaid Demis, Meham Doe, William Doe and Olive Vine, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2012cv02269
Filed: May 8, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge: Nicholas G. Garaufis
Presiding Judge: Marilyn D. Go
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The court ADOPTS IN FULL the R&R and ENTERS default judgment against Defendants in an amount to be determined by Magistrate Judge Go, to whom the matter is REFERRED for an R&R as to the amount of damages. So Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 1/10/2014. (Lee, Tiffeny)
March 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Minute Order for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Marilyn D. Go: Status Conference held on 3/8/2013. Appearance for S. Lucas for plaintiff. Counsel for defendants failed to appear and could not be reached. The Court grants plaintiff's request to amend the caption of this action to reflect plaintiff's correct name, Valerio Pablo Chopen, and plaintiff's 11 Motion to Compel, as set forth in attached order. Defendants must produce the requested discovery by 3/29/2013. D iscovery is extended to 4/30/2013. Defendants are further sanctioned $500, in partial payment of plaintiff's attorneys' fees for this motion, which must be paid by 3/29/2013. Plaintiff must mail a paper copy of this Minute Order on t he individual and corporate defendants, along with the outstanding discovery requests. Defendants are warned that continued failure to comply could result in further sanctions, including entering default judgment. FTR: 11:44 - 11:55. (Albertsen, Joanne)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chopen v. Olive Vine, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pablo Valerio Chopen
Represented By: Scott A. Lucas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Zaid Demis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Meham Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Olive Vine, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?