El-Bey v. T-Mobile (NYC) et al
| US Treasury, IMF, T-Mobile (NYC) and US Corp |
| Stanley Aristilde El-Bey |
| 1:2012cv02738 |
| May 29, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Lois Bloom |
| Allyne R. Ross |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Plaintiff's 6 Amended Request to Proceed IFP is granted solely for the purpose of this Order. Plaintiff's 1 Complaint is dismissed in its entirety for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff's submission entitled 7 "Refused for Cause" to the extent it can be liberally construed as a motion for reconsideration of the Court's 6/13/2012 Order directing plaintiff to file an amended IFP or pay the filing fee is denied as m oot. Plaintiff's 8 "Affidavit as Fact Order to Show Cause for Permanent Relief" is also denied. Any state law claims are dismissed without prejudice. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. SO ORDERED by Judge Allyne R. Ross, on 7/11/2012. C/mailed to pro se Plaintiff. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
|
|
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Plaintiff's 2 request to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP") is denied, and the Court directs plaintiff to either file an amended IFP application or pay the filing fee of $ 350 to the Clerk of Court of the Eastern District of New York within 14 days from the date of this Order in order to proceed with this action. As set forth above, even if plaintiff pays the filing fee or obtains IFP status, the action will be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3), and for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. SO ORDERED by Judge Allyne R. Ross, on 6/13/2012. C/mailed by Chambers to pro se Plaintiff. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
