Rogers v. NYPD (New York City Police Department) et al
Ervin B. Rogers |
New York District Attorney's Office, John Doe 67th Precinct and NYPD (New York City Police Department) |
1:2012cv03042 |
June 13, 2012 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Brooklyn Office |
Carol Bagley Amon |
Marilyn D. Go |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: On June 4, 2013, the Honorable Marilyn D. Go issued a Report and Recommendation (R&R) recommending that this Court dismiss the instant action with prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The parties were given until June 21, 2013 to file objections to the R&R. No objections have been filed to date. Reviewing the R&R for clear error, the Court hereby adopts Magistrate Go's R& R as the opinion of the Court. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this order and closethis case. Ordered by Chief Judge Carol Bagley Amon on 7/23/2013. (fwd for judgment) (Fernandez, Erica) Modified on 7/24/2013 (Fernandez, Erica). c/m |
Filing 12 ORDER denying without prejudice 11 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff must execute and return to counsel for defendant by February 14, 2013 the authorizations for release of sealed arrest and criminal prosecution records and medical records previously sent to plaintiff. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Marilyn D. Go on 2/1/2013. (Proujansky, Josh) (Main Document 12 replaced on 2/1/2013. Footnote added on page 1) (Abdallah, Fida) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM & ORDER: Plaintiff's 2 application to proceed in forma pauperis is granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The New York City Police Department ("N.Y.P.D."), and the District Attorney's Office are d ismissed as defendants pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). No summonses shall issue against these agencies. The Clerk of Court is directed to amend the caption to reflect the dismissal of those defendants. Pla intiff's claims shall proceed against the remaining individual John Doe defendant. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Order and the Complaint to the New York City Law Department. Once Corporation Counsel has pr ovided the requested information for the John Doe defendant, the Clerk is directed to amend the caption of the Complaint to reflect that information and to issue a summons. The United States Marshals Service is directed to serve a copy of the Compla int as amended by the Clerk, this Order, and the summons on the defendant. The Court refers this matter to Magistrate Judge Marilyn Go for pretrial supervision. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. Ordered by Chief Judge Carol Bagley Amon, on 10/12/2012. C/mailed to pro se Plaintiff & Corporation Counsel. (Parties: New York City Police Department and New York District Attorney's Office terminated.) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.