DePrima v. City of New York Department of Education

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Eastern District DePrima v. City of New York Department of Education

DePrima v. City of New York Department of Education

Plaintiff:	Kim DePrima
Defendant:	City of New York Department of Education
Case Number:	1:2012cv03626
Filed:	July 20, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge:	Lois Bloom
Presiding Judge:	Margo K. Brodie
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 29, 2014	Filing 30 ORDER DISMISSING CASE.Plaintiff failed to amend the Second Amended Complaint as required by the Court's March 20, 2014 Memorandum & Order 29 . The Second Amended Complaint is dismissed. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Ordered by Judge Margo K. Brodie on 4/29/2014. (Ramos, Christopher)
March 20, 2014	Filing 29 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS AS MODIFIED. Having considered Magistrate Judge Bloom's 25 Report & Recommendation ("R&R") and the accompanying objections, the Court adopts, as modified, the R&R. For the reasons set forth i n the attached Memorandum & Order, Defendant's motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint is granted. Plaintiff is granted 30 days to file an amended complaint as to her Equal Protection claim based on selective enforcement and her First Amendment retaliation claim based on her right to intimate association. (Ramos, Christopher)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 29, 2014

Filing 30 ORDER DISMISSING CASE.Plaintiff failed to amend the Second Amended Complaint as required by the Court's March 20, 2014 Memorandum & Order 29 . The Second Amended Complaint is dismissed. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Ordered by Judge Margo K. Brodie on 4/29/2014. (Ramos, Christopher)

March 20, 2014

Filing 29 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS AS MODIFIED. Having considered Magistrate Judge Bloom's 25 Report & Recommendation ("R&R") and the accompanying objections, the Court adopts, as modified, the R&R. For the reasons set forth i n the attached Memorandum & Order, Defendant's motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint is granted. Plaintiff is granted 30 days to file an amended complaint as to her Equal Protection claim based on selective enforcement and her First Amendment retaliation claim based on her right to intimate association. (Ramos, Christopher)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DePrima v. City of New York Department of Education
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kim DePrima
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: City of New York Department of Education
Represented By:	Benjamin Welikson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?