Suryadevara v. Unum Group
Plaintiff: Rao Suryadevara
Defendant: Unum Group
Case Number: 1:2012cv03651
Filed: July 24, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge: I. Leo Glasser
Presiding Judge: Ramon E. Reyes
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER denying 25 Motion for Summary Judgment. Ordered by Judge I. Leo Glasser on 3/28/2014. (Parachini, Alexander)
April 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER denying 8 Motion to Dismiss. Ordered by Judge I. Leo Glasser on 4/19/2013. (Levy, Joshua)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Suryadevara v. Unum Group
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unum Group
Represented By: Patrick W. Begos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rao Suryadevara
Represented By: Daniel Millman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?