Zurita v. Bergen Pizza Incorporated et al
Plaintiff: Luis Zurita
Defendant: Bergen Pizza Incorporated and Constantino Moyao Rodriguez
Case Number: 1:2012cv03874
Filed: August 3, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge: Marilyn D. Go
Presiding Judge: Kiyo A. Matsumoto
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 21, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Upon careful consideration of the record and Judge Go's thorough and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation, the court finds no clear error and hereby affirms and adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety as the opinion of the court. Plaintiff is awarded minimum wages of $21,160.44; overtime wages of $12,687.56; spread of hours pay of $3,552.50; liquidated damages under the FLSA of 33,848.00; liquidated damages under th e New York Labor Law of $1,154.56; attorneys' fees of $20,230.47 and costs of $875.68; minus a $7,000 offset for amounts defendants paid to plaintiff before defendants breached the settlement agreement. Accordingly, judgment should be entered for plaintiff and against defendants in the amount of $86,509.21. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to mail a copy of the judgment and this Order to defendants, note service on the docket, and close this case. Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 3/21/2016. (McNulty, John)
April 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. For the reasons set forth in the enclosed Order, the court finds no clear error and hereby affirms and adopts Judge Go's Report and Recommendation in its entirety as the opinion of the court. Accordin gly, the court strikes defendants' answers and respectfully directs the Clerk of the Court to enter default, serve a copy of this order upon pro se defendants at their respective addresses of record on the docket, and note service on the docket. Plaintiff shall file and serve on defendants his motion for entry of a default judgment no later than April 13, 2015. Defendants shall serve and file any opposing papers two weeks thereafter, or by April 27, 2015. If defendants fail to file an opposition by April 27, 2015, plaintiff's motion for entry of a default judgment will be deemed unopposed.Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 4/2/2015. (Alagesan, Deepa)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Zurita v. Bergen Pizza Incorporated et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bergen Pizza Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Constantino Moyao Rodriguez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Luis Zurita
Represented By: Lloyd Robert Ambinder
Represented By: Leonor H Coyle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?