Winkler v. Hirsch et al
| Jerome Winkler |
| Hershey Friedman, Daniel Hirsch, SHF Industries and Agri-Star Meat & Poultry LLC |
| 1:2012cv03893 |
| August 6, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Lois Bloom |
| John Gleeson |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
ORDER granting Friedman's 45 motion to dismiss as set forth in the attached Order. A copy of this order will be mailed to Winkler at his address of record. Ordered by Judge John Gleeson on 8/5/2013. (Kim, Scarlet)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER granting Agri-Star and SHF's 28 Motion to Dismiss for the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order. A copy of the Memorandum and Order will be mailed to Winkler at his address of record. Ordered by Judge John Gleeson on 6/25/2013. (Kim, Scarlet)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER: As explained in the attached Memorandum and Order, the plaintiff is respectfully directed to file an amended complaint within 30 days from the date of entry of this Order. If the plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint that complies with this Order, judgment dismissing the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction shall be entered. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). Ordered by Judge John Gleeson on 8/30/2012. (Talbott, Rebecca)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
