Fernandez v. Turetsky et al
Plaintiff: Edwin Fernandez
Defendant: Patty Whitford, C. Duncar Kerr, Thomas H. Mattox, Margaret Ramsay, Joyce A. Thomas, Vicky Turetsky, Georgia Brown and Robert Doar
Case Number: 1:2012cv04092
Filed: August 13, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge: Marilyn D. Go
Presiding Judge: Roslynn R. Mauskopf
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 56 MEMORANDUM & ORDER granting 52 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. For the reasons stated herein, the State Defendant's 52 motion to dismiss is granted on the grounds that this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the i nstant action under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. For the same reasons, the Court sua sponte dismisses the action against all other defendants. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the case. Ordered by Judge Sandra L. Townes on 11/5/2014. Copy mailed to Edwin Fernandez. (Barrett, C)
March 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 44 RECUSAL ORDER: Out of an abundance of caution, the undersigned will recuse from this action, and directs the Clerk of Court to randomly re-assign this matter to another judge. All requests to file motions shall be made pursuant to the Individual Mo tion Practices and Rules of the newly-assigned judge. The Clerk of Court shall randomly re-assign this action to another judge, and once done, mail a copy this Order and the docket sheet reflecting the re-assignment to plaintiff. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 3/17/2014. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)
October 18, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER DISMISSING CASE: For the reasons set forth in the attached Dismissal Order, this action is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Civil Judgment to plaintiff, and close the file. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 10/18/2012. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)
September 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER re: 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis: For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order,Plaintiff must pay the $350 filing fee or submit an amended IFP application within fourteen (14) days of the date of th is Order in order to proceed with this case. No summons shall issue at this time and all further proceedings shall be stayed for fourteen (14) days or until plaintiff has complied with this Order. If plaintiff fails to pay the filing fee or submit an amended IFP application within the time allowed, the instant complaint shall be dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall mail a copy of this Order to plaintiff, and note such mailing on the docket. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 9/20/2012. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fernandez v. Turetsky et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Patty Whitford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C. Duncar Kerr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas H. Mattox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Margaret Ramsay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joyce A. Thomas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vicky Turetsky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Georgia Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert Doar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Edwin Fernandez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?