Lloyd v. City of New York et al
| Jimmie Lloyd |
| Officer John Wozny, Officer Kevin Blondel, Officer Stephen Burns, City of New York and NYC Metropolitan Transit Authority Police Department |
| 1:2012cv04303 |
| August 22, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Lois Bloom |
| Brian M. Cogan |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER, Pltff's 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The complaint is dismissed against City of NY and the Metropolitan Transportation Authority Police Department as set forth below. No summons sha ll issue against these defts. The complaint against Police Officers Burns, Blondel, and Wozny shall proceed. The Clerk of Court shall prepare a summons against defts Burns, Blondel, and Wozny and the US Marshals Service shall serve the summons, comp laint, and a copy of this Order upon these defts without prepayment of fees. The case is referred to USMJ Bloom for pretrial supervision. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 USC sec. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken on good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an apepal. (Ordered by Judge Brian M. Cogan on 9/5/2012) c/m by chambers with unpublished decisions. (Galeano, Sonia)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
