Slater v. Mackey et al
| Natasha Slater |
| 63rd Precinct, Child Protective Specialist, City of New York, P.O. Karen Mackey, Charmaine McDonald, New York City Admnistration for Child Services, New York City Police Department and P.O. Young |
| 1:2012cv04325 |
| August 28, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Nicholas G. Garaufis |
| Robert M. Levy |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
MEMORANDUM & ORDER re 54 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant McDonald's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 54) is GRANTED. To the extent that Plaintiff purports to assert a new claim in her opposition papers, that claim is DISMIS SED as procedurally barred. This Order disposes of all remaining claims, and so the Clerk of Court is respectfully DIRECTED to close the case. The Clerk is further DIRECTED to send a copy of this order to Plaintiff. So Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 11/21/2016. (c/m to pro se; fwd'd for jgm) (Lee, Tiffeny)
|
|
Filing
38
MEMORANDUM & ORDER: Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED for all claims against the City, the 63rd Precinct, ACS, and the NYPD. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED on the false arrest, false imprison ment, excessive force, malicious prosecution claims related to the Neglect Petitions, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and malicious abuse of process. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED on the malicious pros ecution claim against the Police Defendants to the extent the claim concernsthe assault of AF. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is DENIED on Plaintiff's false allegations of mental illness claim to the extent it is premised on a mis representation claim. Plaintiff's malicious prosecution claim against the Police Defendants concerning the robbery charge, fraud on the court claim, false allegation of drug abuse claim, exposure of a minor to toxins claim, and ex posure of a minor to a website that promotes nudity claim are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Should Slater wish to address the pleading defects in her malicious prosecution of robbery claim, fraud on the court claim, false allegation of dr ug abuse claim, exposure of a minor to toxins claim, or exposure of a minor to a website that promotes nudity claim, she is instructed to file a Second Amended Complaint by December 15, 2015.13 The parties are directed to contact the chambers of Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy in order to determine the schedule for any remaining discovery and any further motion practice. So Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 11/09/2015. (c/m to pro se) (Lee, Tiffeny)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
