Johnson v. Andy Frain Services, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Eastern District Johnson v. Andy Frain Services, Inc.

Johnson v. Andy Frain Services, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Deirdre Johnson
Defendant:	Andy Frain Services, Inc.
Case Number:	1:2012cv04454
Filed:	August 9, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge:	Viktor V. Pohorelsky
Presiding Judge:	William F. Kuntz
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 10, 2015	Filing 68 DECISION AND ORDER [DISMISSING CASE]: Defendant Andy Frain Inc.'s 59 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim is GRANTED. Because Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint fails to state a claim under Title VII, the ADEA, 42 U.S. C. § 1981, NYSHRL, or NYCHRL, it is DISMISSED. Further, the Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE because any further attempts by Plaintiff to re-plead would be futile. SO ORDERED by Judge William F. Kuntz, II on 3/10/2015. (Forwarded for Judgment.) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
June 20, 2014	Filing 53 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Because Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint fails to state a claim under Title VII, the ADEA, 42 U.S.C. § 1981, NYSHRL, or NYCHRL, it is DISMISSED. Plaintiff is directed to file a Third Amended Complaint within 30 days of the date of this Order, or this action will be closed. All other dates are hereby taken off of the Court's calendar, including the trial date set for this action. Ordered by Judge William F. Kuntz, II on 6/19/2014. (Brucella, Michelle)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 10, 2015

Filing 68 DECISION AND ORDER [DISMISSING CASE]: Defendant Andy Frain Inc.'s 59 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim is GRANTED. Because Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint fails to state a claim under Title VII, the ADEA, 42 U.S. C. § 1981, NYSHRL, or NYCHRL, it is DISMISSED. Further, the Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE because any further attempts by Plaintiff to re-plead would be futile. SO ORDERED by Judge William F. Kuntz, II on 3/10/2015. (Forwarded for Judgment.) (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)

June 20, 2014

Filing 53 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Because Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint fails to state a claim under Title VII, the ADEA, 42 U.S.C. § 1981, NYSHRL, or NYCHRL, it is DISMISSED. Plaintiff is directed to file a Third Amended Complaint within 30 days of the date of this Order, or this action will be closed. All other dates are hereby taken off of the Court's calendar, including the trial date set for this action. Ordered by Judge William F. Kuntz, II on 6/19/2014. (Brucella, Michelle)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Andy Frain Services, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Andy Frain Services, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Deirdre Johnson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?