Bossett v. Smith

Bossett v. Smith

Petitioner:	Darrell Bossett
Respondent:	Joseph T. Smith
Case Number:	1:2012cv04902
Filed:	September 27, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge:	Roslynn R. Mauskopf
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 21, 2012	Filing 9 ORDER DENYING RECONSIDERATION: For the reasons stated in the attached written Memorandum and Order, petitioner's motion for reconsideration of the Court's October 18, 2012 Order transferring this action to the Second Circuit as a second or successive habeas petition is DENIED. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 44445 (1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to petitioner. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 12/21/2012. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)
October 18, 2012	Filing 5 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE AS SUCCESSIVE PETITION. For the reasons set forth in the attached Transfer Order, the Court's Order to Show Cause (Doc. No. 2) is vacated, and this petition is hereby transferred to the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The Clerk of Court is directed to effect said transfer, mail a copy of the Transfer Order to petitioner, and close the file in this court. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 10/18/2012. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 21, 2012

Filing 9 ORDER DENYING RECONSIDERATION: For the reasons stated in the attached written Memorandum and Order, petitioner's motion for reconsideration of the Court's October 18, 2012 Order transferring this action to the Second Circuit as a second or successive habeas petition is DENIED. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 44445 (1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to petitioner. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 12/21/2012. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)

October 18, 2012

Filing 5 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE AS SUCCESSIVE PETITION. For the reasons set forth in the attached Transfer Order, the Court's Order to Show Cause (Doc. No. 2) is vacated, and this petition is hereby transferred to the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The Clerk of Court is directed to effect said transfer, mail a copy of the Transfer Order to petitioner, and close the file in this court. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 10/18/2012. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bossett v. Smith
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Joseph T. Smith
Represented By:	KINGS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE - GENERIC
Represented By:	NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERALS OFFICE - GENERIC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Darrell Bossett
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?