Solana v. Warden MDC et al
| Gerardo Solana |
| U.S. Attorney General and Warden MDC |
| 1:2012cv04907 |
| September 27, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Lois Bloom |
| Allyne R. Ross |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Gerardo Solana, a pro se prisoner, brings multiple suits against multiple parties, challenging a variety of official conduct relating to his detention and revocation of parole. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, I grant Solana's 2 request to proceed in forma pauperis and I address all of his claims. 12-CV-3519 and 12-CV-4722 are dismissed. I certify pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that, with respect to these complaints, any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close those cases. 12-CV-4032 and 12-CV-4907 are dismissed without prejudice and with leave to replead within 30 days. Failure to replead within 30 days will result in dismissal. I direct the United States Parole Commission to respond to 12-CV-5235. SO ORDERED by Judge Allyne R. Ross, on 11/8/2012. C/mailed to pro se Petitioner. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
