CLC Enterprises, Inc. v. United States Customs and Border Protection
Plaintiff:
CLC Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant:
United States Customs and Border Protection
Case Number:
1:2012cv06031
Filed:
December 6, 2012
Court:
New York Eastern District Court
Office:
Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge:
Nicholas G. Garaufis
Referring Judge:
Marilyn D. Go
Nature of Suit:
Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Cause of Action:
28:1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By:
None
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: CLC Enterprises, Inc. v. United States Customs and Border Protection | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: CLC Enterprises, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Samidh Guha |
| Represented By: | Arnold A. Spencer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States Customs and Border Protection | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
