Martinez v. Queens County District Attorney et al
| Gilbert M. Martinez |
| Verizon, T-Mobile USA Inc., Reading Hospital, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, ADA Debra Pomodor, New York Supreme Court, Queens County District Attorney, Met-Ed Electric Supplier, Kings County District Attorney, Hon. Scott E. Lash, Hon. Anthony Cannataro, Berks County Family Court, Berks County Human Resources, Berks County Social Security Administration, Berks Community Health Center, Hon. Alice Schlesinger and Saint Joseph Hospital |
| New York City Police Department |
| 1:2012cv06262 |
| December 20, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Roslynn R. Mauskopf |
| Ramon E. Reyes |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
182
JUDGMENT in favor of Berk's County Police Department, Berks Community Health Center, Berks County Family Court, Berks County Human Resources, Berks County Police Department, Berks County Social Security Administration, City of Reading Police De partment, Corporation Counsel For The City Of New York, Kings County District Attorney / Charles J. Hynes, Kings County Family Court, MID-Penn Legal Services, Met-Ed Electric Supplier, Mid-Penn Legal Services, New York City Police Department (Narcoti cs Division), New York City Police Department Civil Section, New York Supreme Court, Queens County District Attorney, Reading Hospital, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Saint Joseph Health Network, Saint Joseph Hospital, T-Mobile US, Inc., T-Mobile USA Inc., Verizon, Gloria A. Margary, Gloria P. Margary, Jessica A. Spector, MIchael D. Carlin, Rafael Margary against Gilbert M. Martinez. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 3/17/2014. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)
|
|
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons stated in the attached written Memorandum and Order, the complaint is DISMISSED against Family Court Judges Lash and Cannataro, Judge Schlesinger, the New York Supreme Court and the Berks and Kings County Family Courts for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to the domestic relations exception. Plaintiffs order to show cause as to these defendants is DENIED on the same ground. The complaint shall proceed as to the remaining defendants. For the r easons above, plaintiffs request for a temporary restraining order as to the alleged conduct of the Kings and Queens District Attorneys Offices and New York Police Department is DENIED. By January 7, 2013, Plaintiff shall serve the r emaining defendants, representatives for the Queens and Kings County District Attorneys Offices and New York City Police Department, a copy of this Order, and plaintiffs request for injunctive relief and all supporting papers, and file proof of such service with the Court. In addition, Plaintiff shall effect service of the summons and complaint upon these defendants pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The remaining defendants shall file their opposition to the motion for preliminary injunction by January 15, 2013.The Clerk of Court is directed to send by overnight mail to plaintiff a copy of this Order. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 12/26/2012. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
