Liberty Global Logistic LLC et al v. United States Maritime Administration et al
Liberty Global Logistic LLC, Liberty Maritime Corporation, Liberty Pride Corporation and Liberty Promise Corporation |
Raymond H. Lahood, David T. Matsuda, United States Department of Transportation, United States Maritime Administration and United States of America |
1:2013cv00399 |
January 23, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Brooklyn Office |
Joan M. Azrack |
Eric N. Vitaliano |
Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 34 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, Counts I -- VIII and Count X are dismissed because, pursuant to the Hobbs Act, those claims should have been brought in the first instance in the court of appeals of appropriate jurisdiction. In addit ion, even if this Court had jurisdiction over these claims, Counts I, IV, V, VI and VIII would be dismissed for want of the causation essential to standing. Further, Liberty also lacks standing to bringCount IX for the reasons discussed in Section II I, supra. Plaintiffs FOIA claims, Counts XI and XII, are also dismissed for the reasons discussed above.The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this Memorandum & Order and to close the case. Ordered by Judge Eric N. Vitaliano on 8/25/2014. (fwd for judgment) (Fernandez, Erica) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.