Lautman v. 2800 Coyle St. Owners Corp. et al
| Leonid Lautman |
| 2800 Coyle St. Owners Corp., Dom Management, Ltd., Mia D. Falls, Irene Fishman, Stan Fishman, Svetlana Marmer, Norris McLaughlin & Marcus, P.A., Esq. Dean M. Roberts, Vladimir Rosenblatt and Alla Shvarts |
| 1:2013cv00967 |
| February 22, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Viktor V. Pohorelsky |
| Allyne R. Ross |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
101
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of Magistrate Judge Pohorelsky. The case is dismissed for lack of prosecution.( Ordered by Judge Allyne R. Ross on 5/4/2015 ) c/m to plaintiff. *Forwarded for judgment. (Guzzi, Roseann)
|
|
Filing
64
OPINION & ORDER: I have reviewed plaintiff's objections to Magistrate Judge Pohorelsky's 57 Order of 6/25/2014, which was made on the record. Neither Magistrate Judge Pohorelsky's denial of plaintiff's request that the magistrate recuse himself from plaintiff's case nor Magistrate Judge Pohorelsky's setting of a discovery schedule against plaintiff's wishes after plaintiff asked to be excused was "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Accordingly, plaintiff's request that the orders be set aside is denied. SO ORDERED by Judge Allyne R. Ross, on 7/22/2014. C/mailed by Chambers to pro se Plaintiff. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
