Moreno v. Holder

Respondent: Eric H. Holder, Jr.
Petitioner: Giovanni Jose Martino Moreno
Case Number: 1:2013cv01285
Filed: March 12, 2013
Court: New York Eastern District Court
Office: Brooklyn Office
Referring Judge: Steven M. Gold
Presiding Judge: William F. Kuntz
Nature of Suit: Mandamus & Other
Cause of Action: 08:1252(a)(2) Injunction for Deportation
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 6, 2013 12 Opinion or Order of the Court DECISION AND ORDER: Absent any statutory basis for concluding that Petitioner is entitled to derivative citizenship, the Court DENIES Petitioner's nationality claim. Ordered by Judge William F. Kuntz, II on 11/5/2013. (Brucella, Michelle)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moreno v. Holder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Eric H. Holder, Jr.
Represented By: Jessica Dawgert
Represented By: Melissa Katherine Lott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Giovanni Jose Martino Moreno
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.